有没有Education is not an end but a means to an end 的完形填空的答案
1.D。推理判断题。根据文章第二段第二句“free education for all is not enough”可推知此题答案为D。
2.A。
3.B。
4.C。
剩下的讲解懒得写了，如果有需要，可以追加提问，我再补充
2.A。
3.B。
4.C。
剩下的讲解懒得写了，如果有需要，可以追加提问，我再补充
温馨提示：答案为网友推荐，仅供参考
第1个回答 2012-04-17
Education is not an end , but a means to an end. In other words, we do not educate children only for the purpose of educating them; our purpose is to fit them for life. As soon as we realize this fact, we will understand that it is very important to choose a good way of education which will really prepare children for life.
In many modern countries it has for some time been fashionable to think that, by free education for all --- whether rich or poor, clever or stupid --- one can solve all the problems of society and build a perfect nation, But we can already see that free education for all is not enough: we find in such countries a far larger number of people with university degrees than there are jobs for them to fill. Because of their degree, they refused to do what they think "low" work; and in fact, work with hands is thought to be dirty and shameful in such countries.
But we have to understand that the work of a completely uneducated farmer is more important than that of a professor in a way: we can live without education, but we die if we have no food. If no one cleaned our streets and took the rubbish away from our houses, we should get terrible diseases in our towns. In countries where there are no servants because nobody is willing to do such work, the professors have to waste much of their time doing housework.
In fact, when we say that all of us must be educated to fit us for life, it means that we must be educated in such a way that, firstly, each of us can do whatever job is suited to his brain and ability, and secondly, that we can realize that all jobs are necessary to society, and that it is very bad to be unwilling to do one's work, or to laugh at someone else's. Only such a type of education can be called valuable to society.本回答被网友采纳
In many modern countries it has for some time been fashionable to think that, by free education for all --- whether rich or poor, clever or stupid --- one can solve all the problems of society and build a perfect nation, But we can already see that free education for all is not enough: we find in such countries a far larger number of people with university degrees than there are jobs for them to fill. Because of their degree, they refused to do what they think "low" work; and in fact, work with hands is thought to be dirty and shameful in such countries.
But we have to understand that the work of a completely uneducated farmer is more important than that of a professor in a way: we can live without education, but we die if we have no food. If no one cleaned our streets and took the rubbish away from our houses, we should get terrible diseases in our towns. In countries where there are no servants because nobody is willing to do such work, the professors have to waste much of their time doing housework.
In fact, when we say that all of us must be educated to fit us for life, it means that we must be educated in such a way that, firstly, each of us can do whatever job is suited to his brain and ability, and secondly, that we can realize that all jobs are necessary to society, and that it is very bad to be unwilling to do one's work, or to laugh at someone else's. Only such a type of education can be called valuable to society.本回答被网友采纳
第2个回答 2012-10-09
教育不是目的,而是达到目的的一种手段。换句话说,我们教育孩子的唯一目的教育他们,我们的目的是让他们适应生活。一旦我们认识到这一事实,我们将明白,这是非常重要的选择的一个好方法,将真正的准备教育孩子的生活。
在许多现代国家,一些年来流行的看法是,通过免费的教育- - - - - -无论是富裕还是贫穷,聪明还是愚蠢的——一个可以解决所有的社会问题,建设一个完美的国家,但我们已经可以看到自由教育是不够的:我们发现在这些国家一个更大数量的人与大学学位比有工作给他们来填补。因为他们的学位,他们拒绝做他们认为“低”的工作;事实上,用双手工作被认为是在这些国家又脏又可耻。
但是我们必须明白的工作完全没有受过教育的农民更重要的是,一个教授在道:我们生活中可以没有教育,但我们死如果我们没有食物。如果没有人清扫街道,把垃圾远离我们的房子,我们应该在我们的城镇得可怕的疾病。在国家没有仆人,因为没人愿意做这样的工作,教授们就不得不浪费了大量的时间做家务。
事实上,当我们说,我们所有人都必须接受教育以适应我们的生活,这就意味着我们必须接受教育,通过这种方式,首先,我们每个人都可以做任何工作是适合他的大脑和能力,其次,我们可以意识到所有的工作都有必要的社会,这是非常糟糕的是不愿意做一个人的工作,或嘲笑别人的。只有这样的教育才能被称为对社会有价值的。
在许多现代国家,一些年来流行的看法是,通过免费的教育- - - - - -无论是富裕还是贫穷,聪明还是愚蠢的——一个可以解决所有的社会问题,建设一个完美的国家,但我们已经可以看到自由教育是不够的:我们发现在这些国家一个更大数量的人与大学学位比有工作给他们来填补。因为他们的学位,他们拒绝做他们认为“低”的工作;事实上,用双手工作被认为是在这些国家又脏又可耻。
但是我们必须明白的工作完全没有受过教育的农民更重要的是,一个教授在道:我们生活中可以没有教育,但我们死如果我们没有食物。如果没有人清扫街道,把垃圾远离我们的房子,我们应该在我们的城镇得可怕的疾病。在国家没有仆人,因为没人愿意做这样的工作,教授们就不得不浪费了大量的时间做家务。
事实上,当我们说,我们所有人都必须接受教育以适应我们的生活,这就意味着我们必须接受教育,通过这种方式,首先,我们每个人都可以做任何工作是适合他的大脑和能力,其次,我们可以意识到所有的工作都有必要的社会,这是非常糟糕的是不愿意做一个人的工作,或嘲笑别人的。只有这样的教育才能被称为对社会有价值的。
