如题所述
表达思想:这是一篇宣扬女权主义的小说。大男子主义导致了两性的不平等,女权主义的倡导也要避免极端的倾向(如小说中超越男性的幻想)。社会的女权主义的终极目标是众生平等(真正意义上的平等)。不是任何一方的超越与凌驾。
出处:美国 凯特·肖邦《一小时的故事》
故事梗概:《一小时的故事》阐述了女性追求平等和自由的主题,是凯特·肖邦一系列描写女性觉醒与反叛作品的序曲。小说讲述了玛拉德夫人在一个小时中历经两次震撼,从获知丈夫因火车事故丧生的消息,到丈夫突然返家,惊愕之中心脏病发作猝死的故事。
扩展资料:
作品背景:
《一小时的故事》是美国一篇短篇故事,最初名为The Dream of an Hour,于1894年发表时改为现名。凯特·肖邦作为美国19世纪重要的女性作家,被誉为“美国女权主义文学创作的先驱之一”。
挑战传统社会行为的作品,如《一小时的故事》,常常被杂志编辑拒绝。然而半个多世纪后,女权主义评论家却大力提倡。
温馨提示:答案为网友推荐,仅供参考
第1个回答 推荐于2017-09-02
The Story of an Hour是一篇非常著名的短篇小说,作者凯特•肖邦叙述了女主人公Mrs. Mallard (Louise)在得知丈夫过世之后的一系列反应。课堂上,老师说已有许多名家对这篇小说做出评论,但不知为何,第一次读这篇小说时就感觉有一种莫名的熟悉。以下是我自己的一些看法:
由小说的第三段“She did not hear the story as many women have heard the same, with a paralyzed inability to accept its significance. She wept at once, with sudden, wild abandonment, in her sister's arms. When the storm of grief had spent itself she went away to her room alone. She would have no one follow her.”可见小说的女主人公Mrs. Mallard是一位Untraditioanal的现代女性。这主要体现在两个方面:第一,她是一位女性。她的内心也很脆弱,在得知丈夫去世时她会悲痛,也会哭泣。第二,她是一位Untraditioanal的现代女性。她不会歇斯底里的无法接受丈夫去世的事实,相反的,她很平静,很坚强,也很独立。她不愿在朋友甚至是妹妹面前伤心。也许她需要的不是别人的安慰而是独自的和解。因而她会回到自己的房间,独自消化。
房间里的布置还是那么的温馨、和谐。坐在扶椅上,她却感到整个人都垮了。生活似乎已没有了希望。望着窗外,树叶已生新芽,细雨绵绵,人们的生活依旧如故。此时的她是否想起了和丈夫在一起的幸福时光?如果他还活着,不,就算他真的已不在了,他一定希望自己还像以前一样活着,不是吗?透过厚厚的云层她看到了一片蓝天,那一定是丈夫在看着她吧。看着看着,她无意识的把头靠在椅罩上,像个孩子在睡梦中抽泣着。也许她是在梦里和丈夫重逢了吧。
她还年轻,也很漂亮,她的脸部的轮廓中透露着一种自制和力量。此刻,她目光呆滞的看着那一点蓝天,好像在想些什么… …
无论是从丈夫对自己的期望还是从自己的实际情况来看,她都应该尽快走出阴影,但她却感到害怕。那么,她害怕什么呢?也许她是怕自己真的会不再想他吧。是的,她是那么深深的爱着他。正因为这种爱让她不再哭泣,她是怕他知道了要伤心吗?可是,她知道当她看到丈夫的尸体时她会无法控制自己,她会想起他们共同度过的幸福生活,她会叹息以后要独自面对生活,她还会哭泣。但是,现在,她要坚强的张开双手“迎接”新生活的到来,因为他希望自己是这么做的。以后的生活她不将再为任何人而活,她要为自己而活,因为丈夫已经成为她自己的一部分。但她清楚无论这种想法是好还是坏,这种想法本身就是矛盾的,因为她真的要垮了。
“就算她有时爱他吧,但大多时候她并不爱他。那又怎样!”她这样安慰自己。是的,现在她恢复了理智,爱情的谜底就算没有解开那又有什么关系呢?现在,让一切都恢复正常吧!
接着她就开始筹划以后的日子。她于是感到整个人都轻松了好多。
过了一会儿,在妹妹的要求下,她开了门.和妹妹一块下楼。正在这时Mr. Mallard拖着疲惫的身体进了门,我们的Louise,因极度的兴奋,死于心脏病。
有人说这是一篇女权主义作品,文中Louise因能够脱离丈夫的控制而欣喜不已,又因丈夫归来而在失望中死去。我赞成Louise是一位独立的女性,但我更相信她是深爱着她的丈夫的。因为她是一位独立的女性,她有思想,有理性,所以她不会歇斯底里,她会从她丈夫的角度来考虑问题;因为她深爱着她的丈夫,所以她能够战胜内心的痛苦,不断的告诉自己要像以前一样生活;因为她对丈夫的爱让她看到丈夫安然无恙时因极度兴奋而死去。总的来说,她的爱是矛盾的,因为她的爱让自己相信她不爱;她的爱还是痛苦的,因为她注定要在不断的挣扎中生存。从女性的角度来说Louise的fancy就是她爱丈夫最好的证明。From the part of a female, Louise’s fancy is the best truth for her love.
这仅是我个人的一点理解
Classical short story of Kate Chopin! I like it very much! The end is opening: You can say that it is a tradegy of a woman who gets freedom finally, and you can also say that it is a victory of a woman.
Kate Chopin was a forgotten American voice until her literary reputation was resuscitated by critics in the 1950s. Today her novel The Awakening (1899) the story of a sensual, determined woman who insists on her independence, is widely read and highly honored, a feminist work which was decidedly ahead of its time. Born Katherine O'FIaherty into an upper-middle-class family in St. Louis, she married Oscar Chopin when she was twenty and moved to her husband's home in Louisiana. In the ten years that she resided in Louisiana she was aware of and receptive to Creole, Cajun, black, and Indian cultures, and when she later came to write fiction, she would incorporate people from these cultures in her work, especially her short stories. When her husband died as a young man, Kate Chopin returned to St. Louis with her six children. Financially secure, she began writing fiction as best she could while rearing her children. She is a good example of an American realist, someone trying to represent life the way it actually is lived, and she acknowledged her debt to the contemporary French naturalists Emile Zola and Guy de Maupassant.
Does the psychological ambivalence dramatized in "The Story of an Hour" ring true or uncomfortably real when we consider honestly our own feelings?本回答被提问者采纳
由小说的第三段“She did not hear the story as many women have heard the same, with a paralyzed inability to accept its significance. She wept at once, with sudden, wild abandonment, in her sister's arms. When the storm of grief had spent itself she went away to her room alone. She would have no one follow her.”可见小说的女主人公Mrs. Mallard是一位Untraditioanal的现代女性。这主要体现在两个方面:第一,她是一位女性。她的内心也很脆弱,在得知丈夫去世时她会悲痛,也会哭泣。第二,她是一位Untraditioanal的现代女性。她不会歇斯底里的无法接受丈夫去世的事实,相反的,她很平静,很坚强,也很独立。她不愿在朋友甚至是妹妹面前伤心。也许她需要的不是别人的安慰而是独自的和解。因而她会回到自己的房间,独自消化。
房间里的布置还是那么的温馨、和谐。坐在扶椅上,她却感到整个人都垮了。生活似乎已没有了希望。望着窗外,树叶已生新芽,细雨绵绵,人们的生活依旧如故。此时的她是否想起了和丈夫在一起的幸福时光?如果他还活着,不,就算他真的已不在了,他一定希望自己还像以前一样活着,不是吗?透过厚厚的云层她看到了一片蓝天,那一定是丈夫在看着她吧。看着看着,她无意识的把头靠在椅罩上,像个孩子在睡梦中抽泣着。也许她是在梦里和丈夫重逢了吧。
她还年轻,也很漂亮,她的脸部的轮廓中透露着一种自制和力量。此刻,她目光呆滞的看着那一点蓝天,好像在想些什么… …
无论是从丈夫对自己的期望还是从自己的实际情况来看,她都应该尽快走出阴影,但她却感到害怕。那么,她害怕什么呢?也许她是怕自己真的会不再想他吧。是的,她是那么深深的爱着他。正因为这种爱让她不再哭泣,她是怕他知道了要伤心吗?可是,她知道当她看到丈夫的尸体时她会无法控制自己,她会想起他们共同度过的幸福生活,她会叹息以后要独自面对生活,她还会哭泣。但是,现在,她要坚强的张开双手“迎接”新生活的到来,因为他希望自己是这么做的。以后的生活她不将再为任何人而活,她要为自己而活,因为丈夫已经成为她自己的一部分。但她清楚无论这种想法是好还是坏,这种想法本身就是矛盾的,因为她真的要垮了。
“就算她有时爱他吧,但大多时候她并不爱他。那又怎样!”她这样安慰自己。是的,现在她恢复了理智,爱情的谜底就算没有解开那又有什么关系呢?现在,让一切都恢复正常吧!
接着她就开始筹划以后的日子。她于是感到整个人都轻松了好多。
过了一会儿,在妹妹的要求下,她开了门.和妹妹一块下楼。正在这时Mr. Mallard拖着疲惫的身体进了门,我们的Louise,因极度的兴奋,死于心脏病。
有人说这是一篇女权主义作品,文中Louise因能够脱离丈夫的控制而欣喜不已,又因丈夫归来而在失望中死去。我赞成Louise是一位独立的女性,但我更相信她是深爱着她的丈夫的。因为她是一位独立的女性,她有思想,有理性,所以她不会歇斯底里,她会从她丈夫的角度来考虑问题;因为她深爱着她的丈夫,所以她能够战胜内心的痛苦,不断的告诉自己要像以前一样生活;因为她对丈夫的爱让她看到丈夫安然无恙时因极度兴奋而死去。总的来说,她的爱是矛盾的,因为她的爱让自己相信她不爱;她的爱还是痛苦的,因为她注定要在不断的挣扎中生存。从女性的角度来说Louise的fancy就是她爱丈夫最好的证明。From the part of a female, Louise’s fancy is the best truth for her love.
这仅是我个人的一点理解
Classical short story of Kate Chopin! I like it very much! The end is opening: You can say that it is a tradegy of a woman who gets freedom finally, and you can also say that it is a victory of a woman.
Kate Chopin was a forgotten American voice until her literary reputation was resuscitated by critics in the 1950s. Today her novel The Awakening (1899) the story of a sensual, determined woman who insists on her independence, is widely read and highly honored, a feminist work which was decidedly ahead of its time. Born Katherine O'FIaherty into an upper-middle-class family in St. Louis, she married Oscar Chopin when she was twenty and moved to her husband's home in Louisiana. In the ten years that she resided in Louisiana she was aware of and receptive to Creole, Cajun, black, and Indian cultures, and when she later came to write fiction, she would incorporate people from these cultures in her work, especially her short stories. When her husband died as a young man, Kate Chopin returned to St. Louis with her six children. Financially secure, she began writing fiction as best she could while rearing her children. She is a good example of an American realist, someone trying to represent life the way it actually is lived, and she acknowledged her debt to the contemporary French naturalists Emile Zola and Guy de Maupassant.
Does the psychological ambivalence dramatized in "The Story of an Hour" ring true or uncomfortably real when we consider honestly our own feelings?本回答被提问者采纳