1.While titanium-based alloys exhibit excellent properties at elevated temperatures like nickel-based alloys, they have densities tending more towards aluminum (2.8 g/cm3) than nickel (8.8 g/cm3).
2.One such approach of normalizing the effect is to take a ratio of the flank wear (length amount of material removed on the flank) and then divide it by the actual length of pass for material removed.
3.Innovative tools like self-propelled rotary tools are also worth consideration as evident from results given in the same table where self-propelled rotary tools revealed significant improvement in tool life.
1.虽然钛基合金在高温时表现出像镍基合金一样的优异性能，但钛基合金的密度却比镍（镍的密度为8.8 g/cm3）更趋近于铝（铝的密度为2.8 g/cm3）。（意思是钛合金不仅高温性能好而且质轻，钛的密度是四点几）
3.诸如“自推进式旋转刀具”之类的创新刀具也是很好的证据，这些证据来源于由同一表格得出的结论，该表格中“自推进式旋转刀具”的刀具寿命有很大的提高。
（小妹，仅供参考啊）追问
3.诸如“自推进式旋转刀具”之类的创新刀具也是很好的证据，这些证据来源于由同一表格得出的结论，该表格中“自推进式旋转刀具”的刀具寿命有很大的提高。
（小妹，仅供参考啊）追问
姐姐 十分感谢~~~
温馨提示：答案为网友推荐，仅供参考
第1个回答 2011-03-10
1.高温下，当钛合金表现出像镍合金一样优越的特性时，其密度更趋近于铝(2.8 g/cm3)而不是镍(8.8 g/cm3)。
2.使效果标准化的一个方法是，取一定比例的侧面磨损（侧面上去除的材料长度值），然后将其按材料去除后的实际孔型长度来分类。
（pass这里翻译成了“孔型”，值得商榷。）
3.在同样的平台上进行试验，由于自动旋转刀具的寿命显示出巨大的提升，因此像这样的创新型刀具也是值得考虑的。
（table这里翻译成了“平台”，值得商榷。）追问
2.使效果标准化的一个方法是，取一定比例的侧面磨损（侧面上去除的材料长度值），然后将其按材料去除后的实际孔型长度来分类。
（pass这里翻译成了“孔型”，值得商榷。）
3.在同样的平台上进行试验，由于自动旋转刀具的寿命显示出巨大的提升，因此像这样的创新型刀具也是值得考虑的。
（table这里翻译成了“平台”，值得商榷。）追问
谢谢~~
第2个回答 2011-03-10
1.While titanium-based alloys exhibit excellent properties at elevated temperatures like nickel-based alloys, they have densities tending more towards aluminum (2.8 g/cm3) than nickel (8.8 g/cm3).
2.One such approach of normalizing the effect is to take a ratio of the flank wear (length amount of material removed on the flank) and then divide it by the actual length of pass for material removed.
3.Innovative tools like self-propelled rotary tools are also worth consideration as evident from results given in the same table where self-propelled rotary tools revealed significant improvement in tool life.
2.One such approach of normalizing the effect is to take a ratio of the flank wear (length amount of material removed on the flank) and then divide it by the actual length of pass for material removed.
3.Innovative tools like self-propelled rotary tools are also worth consideration as evident from results given in the same table where self-propelled rotary tools revealed significant improvement in tool life.
