这两个有什么区别么,造一个句子
have been in 其实是用了延续性动词之后的变化[arrive in /get to / reach相对应的延续性动词是be in],所以有时间段之类的词时要用它;
have been to 表示某人曾经去过某地,现在在本地,一般与短暂性动词搭配
have gone to 表示某人去了某地或在去某地的路上,现在不在本地,也是与 短暂性动词搭配
如:1、He has been in shanghai for about three years.(他到上海已经三年了)
2、He has been to shanghai three times.(他曾经去过三次上海)
3、---It must be lilei. 那肯定是李磊
---It can't be lilei,He has gone to shanghai。那肯定不是李磊,他已经去了上海。
have been to 表示某人曾经去过某地,现在在本地,一般与短暂性动词搭配
have gone to 表示某人去了某地或在去某地的路上,现在不在本地,也是与 短暂性动词搭配
如:1、He has been in shanghai for about three years.(他到上海已经三年了)
2、He has been to shanghai three times.(他曾经去过三次上海)
3、---It must be lilei. 那肯定是李磊
---It can't be lilei,He has gone to shanghai。那肯定不是李磊,他已经去了上海。
温馨提示:答案为网友推荐,仅供参考
第1个回答 2010-05-08
have been in指的是在某地待着,
比如I have been in China for two years.意思是,我已经在中国待了两年了.
而have been to是已经去了某地,
比如She has been to Beijing for a week.意思是她已经去北京有一周了.
且主语一般不用I.
不知满意不.
比如I have been in China for two years.意思是,我已经在中国待了两年了.
而have been to是已经去了某地,
比如She has been to Beijing for a week.意思是她已经去北京有一周了.
且主语一般不用I.
不知满意不.