Or do newborns simply prefer more to fewer? The same experiment, but with three spots shown before two, shows the same return of interest when the number of spots changes. Perhaps it is just the newness? When slightly older babies were shown cards with pictures of objects（a comb, a key, an orange and so on）, changing the number of objects had an effect separate from changing the objects themselves.【Could it be the pattern that two things make, as opposed to three? No again. Babies paid more attention to squares moving randomly on a screen when their number changed from two to three, or three to two. The effect even crosses between senses. Babies who were repeatedly shown two spots became more excited when they then heard three drumbeats than when they heard just two; likewise（同样地）when the researchers started with drumbeats and moved to spots.】
请标准翻译【】里的这一段（不要机器翻译的）。谢谢
They baby is just one day old and has not yet left hospital. She is quiet but alert（警觉）. Twenty centimeters from her face researchers have placed a white card with two black spots on it. She stares at it carefully. A researcher removes the card and replaces it by another, this time with the spots differently spaced. As the cards change from one to the other, her gaze（凝视）starts to lose its focus - until a third, with three black spots, is presented. Her gaze returns；为方便翻译，给出你们上文。
（我前天才做了这篇阅读，希望对你有帮助～）
（2）市场和排队，付款和等待是两种不同形式的事情，无论哪一种都会导致不同的结果，有道德的进行排队，“先到先得”具有公平公正的魅力，他们告诉我们忽略特权，权力和雄厚的资金。
（3）与运动场和公交车站的原理相似，但有道德的进行排队不适用于所有场合。如果我要出售我的房子，我没有义务接受随之而来第一次的报价，而仅仅因为他是最先的报价，出售房子和等待公交车是两种不同的社会行为，他们由不同的标准所支配掌控。
以上，望采纳哦~~~
