帮忙翻译一段英文谢谢

This paper reviews “right-to-know” acts and examines the policy and methods used to implement them. It introduces two of the better known right-to-know schemes, the United States Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act (EPCRA)1 and the European Community’s *100 Seveso Directive.2 It surveys other international and domestic right-to-know strategies and then discusses two major approaches to right-to-know legislation using EPCRA and the Seveso Directive as examples of documenting divergent approaches to risk communication. The paper, in closing, introduces Principle 10 of the Rio Declaration,3 which calls for the development and implementation of right-to-know legislation throughout the international community. It then discusses the importance of right-to-know legislation in the preservation of the global environment. After comparing the relative merits of both types of right-to-know programs, the paper concludes by recommending countries combine the elements of both American and European strategies in developing a strong and effective right-to-know program.

本文综述“知情权”行为,探讨了政策和方法用于实现它们。介绍两个比较知名的了解权计划,美国应急计划和社区知情权法案(EPCRA)1和欧洲共同体的*
100化工厂Directive.2调查其他国际和国内知情权策略,然后讨论了两种主要的方法使用EPCRA知情权立法和化工厂指令记录发散风险沟通方法的例子。,最后,介绍了里约宣言的原则10
3的要求开发和实现知情权的立法,在整个国际社会。然后讨论了知情权的重要性立法在保护全球环境。在比较两种类型的知情权的相对优势项目,本文得出结论,建议国家把美国和欧洲的元素在发展中一个强大和有效的了解权计划策略。追问

确定不是机翻?

温馨提示:答案为网友推荐,仅供参考

相关了解……

你可能感兴趣的内容

本站内容来自于网友发表,不代表本站立场,仅表示其个人看法,不对其真实性、正确性、有效性作任何的担保
相关事宜请发邮件给我们
© 非常风气网